Thursday 3 December 2015

Charles Dickens' The Christmas Carol




Title:
Charles Dickens’ The Christmas Carol

Format:
Short all-film production made for sale to US television stations

Country:
USA

Production company:
Jerry Fairbanks Inc, for The Teletec Company

Year:
1949

Length:
25 minutes

Setting:
Victorian – a mention of Bob’s wages being “15 shillings” suggests we’re supposed to be in Britain, although the accents are almost all American, and evidently shillings did survive as common currently in parts of the USA deep into the 19th century.

Background:
We’re in the very early days of television here, and this is what the Americans would later come to call a direct-to-syndication production – meaning not something made by or for one of the main broadcast networks, but made independently for sale to individual stations across the country. This is presumably part of the reason why it’s a film production, rather than something made live in a television studio as was still common in the USA – and remained so for much longer elsewhere – at the time.

Cast and crew:
The most famous name on display here is that of Vincent Price, the actor most commonly associated now with his horror film roles, or perhaps his narration on Michael Jackson’s Thriller. Only really being personally familiar with him from the latter, I was rather surprised by his somewhat camp performance here. Still, he’s a cheerful enough presence as an on-screen narrator who provides linking scenes “reading” from a copy of the book in a modern living room – although you’d think that if they had a copy of the book handy, they might have at least got the title right…

Speaking of errors, Taylor Holmes here plays “Ebeneezer” Scrooge, with two Es in the middle, although I’ll be kinder on them for this mistake as it’s one I myself made for several years when I was a younger man! Holmes had enjoyed a long career on the stage and in film, managing to survive the transition from silent to sound films, and perhaps his highest-profile screen credit is a small part in Marilyn Monroe’s Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. He was in his 70s by this point, and quite lively for it, but his melodramatic and over-the-top “Ebeneezer” will not go down as one of the great screen Scrooges.

Future Bond girl Jill St. John, who appeared opposite Sean Connery in Diamonds are Forever, has a small role as one of the Cratchit children. She was just nine years old at the time, and credited here as Jill Oppenheim.

Adapter and director Arthur Pierson had been both an actor and a director for some years, but probably did his most notable work after this, as a story supervisor on animated classics The Jetsons and The Flintstones.

Underdone Potato:
Just a visit from Fred to the money-changing chambers, with no businessmen trying to solicit a donation from Scrooge. Fred’s visit is brief, before Scrooge heads off home, and we don’t even have the door knocker scene here. Marley looks quite good, and the scene between him and Scrooge probably plays out about as faithfully as anything in this production does – things go off the rails a bit later on!

Vincent Price - he's no Gonzo, more's the pity.
Past:
As you’d expect from such a short version of the story, all of the visitations from the spirits are quite brief. However, one thing this version does get surprisingly right – and almost no other version does – is that Scrooge is so shocked by his visitation from Marley that he goes to bed still dressed, and remains so throughout his time with the spirits. (Although having said that, the original’s illustrator, John Leech, seemed to make the same mistake back in 1843).

The Ghost of Christmas Past is male rather than androgynous, and doesn’t have any sort of cap for snuffing out. He shows Scrooge a single vision of himself as a boy at school, and then oddly threatens to show him his love leaving him (Belle isn’t named here), specifying that it was “forty years ago.” However, Scrooge begs him to leave him be before he can present this vision.

Present:
He has the fur-lined coat but not the beard of traditional versions, and this Ghost of Christmas Present is more of a stern, muscular bully than a jolly giant. He doesn’t seem at all celebratory, as he shows Scrooge the Christmas dinner scene at the Cratchit household. Martha is there but doesn’t hide, there’s not even a small goose to be had, and Robert Hyatt looks utterly delighted with himself for managing to remember his “God bless us, every one,” line as Tiny Tim.

Yet to Come:
An intriguing-looking Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come. He has something of the traditional appearance, but the fact we can see his hands and more importantly, his eyes in a thin slit between his hood and some sort of scarf covering the lower part of his face makes it look more like he’s wearing a niqab than a grim reaper costume.

He shows Scrooge the Cratchits mourning Tiny Tim, and then his own grave, although by this stage Scrooge was already well on the way to becoming a reformed character, having submitted fairly meekly quite early on.

What’s To-Day:
Scrooge does shout down to a boy, although we don’t see him – just Scrooge at the window. He isn’t sent for a turkey, either, as the whole thing suddenly goes drastically off-piste. We go to the Cratchits and find Fred and his wife surprisingly coming to the door – Bob seems oddly happy to see them, but apologises that they can’t offer much. Fred says that’s fine… and in comes the reformed Scrooge behind them, carrying gifts and food. Cheerful “Ebeneezer” also tells Tiny Tim that he met “an old friend of mine, a famous surgeon” at church, and that he’s going to help make Tim better again.

"I am the Ghost of Christmas Present, and I am a mean bastard!"
Review:
Despite having the advantages of twenty-odd years’ worth of production advances and most importantly the addition of sound, this doesn’t even manage to be as decent a retelling of the story as the 1923 silent version, which had a similar running time. When they don’t even have the attention to detail to get the title and the main character’s name correct, you can tell that they aren’t really paying attention.

It’s a cheap version, and cheapness is no sin in itself as many a necessity has been the mother of great invention in film and television down the years. But it all seems very slapdash, especially when skipping so quickly through so many of the visions. What’s all the more inexplicable, given the short running time, is that it spends the first two minutes just having a choir warbling over the opening titles.

In a nutshell:
Another one for the completists. Save your attention for any version which at least manages to get the title right.

Links:

No comments:

Post a Comment